VEGETOS: An International Journal of Plant Research & Biotechnology
(Society For Plant Research)

Research Articles

A SOCIETY FOR PLANT RESEARCH PUBLICATION


Volume: 33, Issue: 1, March 2020


Print ISSN : 0970-4078.
Online ISSN : 2229-4473.
Website:www.vegetosindia.org
Pub Email: contact@vegetosindia.org
Views: 160

Doi: 10.1007/s42535-019-00088-3
Doi Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-019-00088-3
First Page: 106
Last Page: 116
Published: 17 December, 2019

Impact of pre-anthesis photosynthetic traits on yield of wheat cultivars under in vivo condition: insight based on biochemical models


Abstract:

Photosynthesis could be improved by increasing photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area and by optimizing light interception and utilization through modified canopy architecture, and also by modifying photosynthetic duration. The yield potential of wheat is determined by the accumulated photosynthates over the entire growing season or the fraction of the total biomass partitioned into grain at harvest. Significant correlation between grain yield and net photosynthesis rate was found under controlled environmental condition (in vitro) but similar relationship under open field conditions is not established. However, phenotyping of photosynthetic traits based on biochemical models can provide accurate physiological information, and thus connecting those traits with yield at crop level would only make crop improvement feasible involving photosynthetic manipulations. At this perspective, the present investigation was undertaken with ten diverse wheat genotypes to characterize pre-anthesis photosynthetic traits and its possible relationship with wheat productivity under in vivo condition. Genotypes were found to have high natural variations for pre-anthesis photosynthetic traits under in vivo condition. Genotypes like DPW-621-50, K 0307, HW 2044 were having high value of Vcmax, Jmax and Cc and thus expected to have better photosynthetic efficiency under ambient atmospheric CO2 condition. Rubisco specificity factor (τ) was found high in KRL-210, HD 2009, KRL-19 and thus expected to have better carboxylase activity under normal condition. Maximum genetic distance was recorded between KRL-210 and DPW-621-50. Rubisco specificity factor (τ) was found as highly correlated with fraction of photorespiration (F) and chloroplast CO2 concentration (Cc). Positive correlation of Cc with fraction of photorespiration (F), mesophyll conductance (gm) and Rubisco specificity factor (τ) indicated high value of CO2 compensation point (Г*). However, correlation between flag leaf photosynthesis rate and grain or biological yield was found non-significant in the present wheat genotypes.

Vegetos

Keywords:


Photosynthesis, Pre-anthesis, In vivo, Rubisco specificity factor, Wheat


References:


  1. ´Alvaro F, Isidro J, Villegas D, Garc´ıa del Moral LF, Royo C (2008) Old and modern durum wheat varieties from Italy and Spain differ in spike components. Field Crops Res 106:86–93

  2. Aggarwal PK, Fischer RA, Liboon SP (1990) Source–sink relation and effects of post anthesis canopy defoliation in wheat at low latitudes. J Agric Sci 114:93–99

  3. Ahmadi A, Joudi M, Janmohamadi M (2009) Late defoliation and wheat yield: little evidence of post anthesis source limitation. Field Crops Res 113:90–93

  4. Araus JL, Slafer GA, Reynolds MP, Royo C (2002) Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we breed for? Ann Bot 89:925–940

  5. Araus JL, Slafer GA, Royo C, Serret MD (2008) Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27:377–412

  6. Berger M, Planchon C (1990) Physiological factors determining yield in bread wheat: effects of introducing dwarfism genes. Euphytica 51:33–39

  7. Bernacchi CJ, Singsaas EL, Pimentel C, Portis AR, Long SP (2001) Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 24:253–259

  8. Bernacchi CJ, Bagley JE, Serbin SP, Ruiz-Vera UM, Rosenthal DM, VanLoocke A (2013) Modelling C3 photosynthesis from the chloroplast to the ecosystem. Plant Cell Environ 36:1641–1657

  9. Blum A (1990) Variation among wheat cultivars in the response of leaf gas-exchange to light. J Agric Sci 115:305–311

  10. Blum A (1998) Improving wheat grain filling under stress by stem reserve mobilization. Euphytica 100:77–83

  11. Carmo-Silva E, Andralojk PJ, Scales JC, Driever SM, Mead A, Lawson T, Raines CA, Parry MAJ (2017) Phenotyping of field-grown wheat in the UK highlights contribution of light response of photosynthesis and flag leaf longevity to grain yield. J Exp Bot 68(13):3473–3486

  12. Chytyk CJ, Hucl PJ, Gray GR (2011) Leaf photosynthetic properties and biomass accumulation of selected western Canadian spring wheat cultivars. Can J Plan Sci 91:305–314

  13. Driever SM, Lawson T, Andralojc PJ, Raines CA, Parry MAJ (2014) Natural variation in photosynthetic capacity, growth, and yield in 64 field-grown wheat genotypes. J Exp Bot 65:4959–4973

  14. Evans JR (2013) Improved photosynthetic efficiency is necessary to increase potential crop yield. In: Gready JE, Dwyer SA, Evans JR (eds) Applying photosynthesis research to improvement of food crops, ACIAR Proceedings No. 140, pp 96–111

  15. Evans LT, Bingham J, Jackson P, Sutherland J (1972) Effect of awns and drought on the supply of photosynthate and its distribution within wheat ears. Ann Appl Biol 70:67–76

  16. Farage PK, Long SP, Lechner EG, Baker NR (1991) The sequence of change within the photosynthetic apparatus of wheat following short-term exposure to ozone. Plant Physiol 95:529–535

  17. Farquhar GD, Von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149:78–90

  18. Fischer RA (2007) Understanding the physiological basis of yield potential in wheat. J Agric Sci 145:99–113

  19. Fischer RA, Rees D, Sayre KD, Lu ZM, Condon AG, Saaverda AL (1998) Wheat yield progress associated with higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate and cooler canopies. Crop Sci 38:1467–1475

  20. Flexas J, Ribas-Carbo M, Diaz-Espejo A, Galmes J, Medrano H (2008) Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects. Plant Cell Environ 31:602–621

  21. Foulkes MJ, Snape JW, Shearman VJ, Reynolds MP, Gaju O, Sylvester-Bradley R (2007) Genetic progress in yield potential in wheat: recent advances and future prospects. J Agric Sci 145:17–29

  22. Foulkes MJ, Slafer GA, Davies WJ, Berry PM, Sylvester-Bradley R, Martre P, Calderini DF, Griffiths S, Reynolds MP (2011) Raising yield potential of wheat. III. Optimizing partitioning to grain while maintaining lodging resistance. J Exp Bot 62:469–486

  23. Gaju O, DeSilva J, Carvalho P, Hawkesford MJ, Griffiths S, Greenland A, Foulkes MJ (2016) Leaf photosynthesis and associations with grain yield, biomass and nitrogen-use efficiency in landraces, synthetic-derived lines and cultivars in wheat. Field Crops Res 193:1–15

  24. Groenendijk M, Dolman AJ, van der Molen MK, Leuning R, Arneth A, Delpierr N, Gash JHC, Lindroth A, Richardson AD, Verbeeck H, Wohlfahrt G (2011) Assessing parameter variability in a photosynthesis model within and between plant functional types using global Fluxnet eddy covariance data. Agric For Meteorol 151:22–38

  25. Guoth A, Tari I, Galle A, Csizsar J, Horvath F, Pecsvaradi A, Cseuz L, Erdei L (2009) Chlorophyll a flourescence induction parameters of flag leaves characterize genotypes and not the drought tolerance of wheat during grain filling under water deficit. Acta Biol Szeged 53(1):1–7

  26. Hikosaka K, Shigeno A (2009) The role of Rubisco and cell walls in the interspecific variation in photosynthetic capacity. Oecologia 160:443–451

  27. Ju J, Yamamoto Y, Wang YL, Shan YH, Dong GC, Miyazaki A, Yoshida T (2009) Genotypic differences in dry matter accumulation, nitrogen use efficiency and harvest index in recombinant inbred lines of rice under hydroponic culture. Plant Prod Sci 12:208–216

  28. Larcher W (2003) Physiological plant ecology. Springer, Berlin, p 513

  29. Lawson T, Kramer DM, Raines CA (2012) Improving yield by exploiting mechanisms underlying natural variation of photosynthesis. Curr Opin Biol 23:215–220

  30. Long SP, Bernacchi CJ (2003) Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photo- synthesis? Procedures and sources of error. J Exp Bot 54:2393–2401

  31. Long SP, Zhu XG, Naidu SL, Ort DR (2006) Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant Cell Environ 29:315–330

  32. Parry MAJ, Madgwick PJ, Carvahlo JFC, Andralojc PJ (2007) Prospects for increasing photosynthesis by overcoming the limitations of Rubisco. J Agric Sci 145:31–43

  33. Parry MAJ, Reynolds M, Salvucci ME, Raines C, Andralojc PJ, Zhu XG, Price GD, Condon AG, Furbank RT (2011) Raising yield potential of wheat. II. Increasing photosynthetic capacity and efficiency. J Exp Bot 62:453–467

  34. Parry MA, Andralojc PJ, Scales JC, Salvucci ME, Carmo-Silva AE, Alonso H, Whitney SM (2013) Rubisco activity and regulation as targets for crop improvement. J Exp Bot 64:717–730

  35. Raines CA (2006) Transgenic approaches to manipulate the environmental responses of the C3 carbon fixation cycle. Plant Cell Environ 29:331–339

  36. Raines CA (2011) Increasing photosynthetic carbon assimilation in C3 plants to improve crop yield: current and future strategies. Plant Physiol 155:36–42

  37. Reynolds M, Tuberosa R (2008) Translational research impacting on crop productivity in drought-prone environments. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:171–179

  38. Reynolds MP, Delgado MI, Gutierrez-Rodriguez M, Larque- Saavedra A (2000) Photosynthesis of wheat in a warm, irrigated environment. I: genetic diversity and crop productivity. Field Crops Res 66:37–50

  39. Reynolds MP, Braun H, Pietragalla J, Ortiz R (2007) Challenges to international wheat breeding. Euphytica 157:281–285

  40. Reynolds M, Foulkes J, Furbank R, Griffiths S, King J, Murchie E, Parry M, Slafer G (2012) Achieving yield gains in wheat. Plant Cell Environ 35:1799–1823

  41. Richards RA (2000) Selectable traits to increase crop photosynthesis and yield of grain crops. J Exp Bot 51:447–458

  42. Sadras VO, Lawson C, Montoro A (2012) Photosynthetic traits in Australian wheat varieties released between 1958 and 2007. Field Crops Res 134:19–29

  43. Sharkey TD (2016) What gas exchange data can tell us about photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 30(9):1035–1040

  44. Simkin AJ, McAusland L, Headland LR, Lawson T, Raines CA (2015) Multigene manipulation of photosynthetic carbon assimilation increases CO2 fixation and biomass yield in tobacco. J Exp Bot 66:4075–4090

  45. Sylvester-Bradley R, Scott RK, Wright CE (1990) Physiology in the production and improvement of cereals, 18th edn. Home-Grown Cereals Authority Research Review, HGCA, London

  46. Tanaka Yu, Kumagai E, Tazoe Y, Adachi S, Homma K (2014) Leaf photosynthesis and its genetic improvement from the perspective of energy flow and CO2 diffusion. Plant Prod Sci 17(2):111–123

  47. R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 24 Nov 2019

  48. Thorne NG (1973) Physiology of grain yield of wheat and barley. Rothamsted experimental station report, vol 2, Harpenden, UK

  49. Tollenaar M, Lee EA (2006) Dissection of physiological processes underlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and heterosis. Maydica 51:399–408

  50. Uddling J, Gelang-Alfredsson J, Karlsson PE, Selldén G, Pleijel H (2008) Source–sink balance of wheat determines responsiveness of grain production to increased [CO2] and water supply. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127:215–222

  51. Von Caemmerer S (2000) Biochemical models of leaf photosynthesis. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne

  52. Von Caemmerer S, Evans RJ (2015) Temperature responses of mesophyll conductance differgreatly between species. Plant Cell Environ 38:629–637

  53. Whitney SM, Houtz RL, Alonso H (2011) Advancing our understanding and capacity to engineer nature’s CO2 sequestering enzyme, Rubisco. Plant Physiol 155:27–35

  54. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Cornelissen JH, Falster DS, Garnier E, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee W, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Villar R, Warton DI, Westoby M (2005) Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. New Phytol 166(2):485–496

  55. Wullschleger SD (1993) Biochemical limitations to carbon assimilation in C3 plants-a retrospective analysis of the A/Ci curves from 109 species. J Exp Bot 44:907–920

  56. Yamori W, Evans JR, von Caemmerer S (2010) Effects of growth and measurement light intensities on temperature dependence of CO2 assimilation rate in tobacco leaves. Plant Cell Environ 33:332–343

  57. Yamori W, Makino A, Shikanai T (2016) A physiological role of cyclic electron transport around photosystem I in sustaining photosynthesis under fluctuating light in rice. Sci Rep 6:20147

  58. Yang J, Zhang J (2010) Crop management techniques to enhance harvest index in rice. J Exp Bot 61(12):3177–3189

  59. Zadoks JC, Changt TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421

  60. Zhang H, Zhang S, Zhang J, Yang J, Wang Z (2008) Post anthesis moderate wetting drying improves both quality and quantity of rice yield. Agron J 100:726–734

  61. Zhao XQ, Xu JL, Zhao M, Lafitte R, Zhu L, Fu BY, Gao YM, Li ZK (2008) QTLs affecting morph-physiological traits related to drought tolerance detected in overlapping introgression lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci 174:618–625

  62. Zhu XG, Long SP, Ort DR (2008) What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass? Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:153–159

  63. Zhu XG, Long SP, Ort DR (2010) Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Ann Rev Plant Biol 61:235–261

  64. Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A, Song X-J, Ito M, Asano K, Matsuoka M, Kitano H, Ashikari M (2010) OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nat Genet 42(6):545–549

  65. Parry MAJ, Keys AJ, Gutteridge S (1989) Variation in the specificity factor of C-3 higher-plant Rubisco determined by the total consumption of ribulose-P-2. J Exp Bot 40:317–320

  66. Yamori W, Suzuki K, Noguchi K, Nakai M, Terashima I (2006) Effects of Rubisco kinetics and Rubisco activation state on the temperature dependence of the photosynthetic rate in spinach leaves from contrasting growth temperatures. Plant Cell Environ 29(8):1659–1670

  67. Nelson CJ (1988) Genetic associations between photosynthetic characteristics and yield: review of the evidence. Plant Physiol Biochem 26:543–554


  68.  


Acknowledgements :



This research work was financially supported by providing Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspired Research (INSPIRE) Fellowship (IF-150559) to the first author from Department of Science and Technology under Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India.


Author Information:



Sourav Maity
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Cooch Behar, India

Puspendu Dutta
Department of Seed Science and Technology, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Cooch Behar, India
pdutta.pph@gmail.com

Saikat Das
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Cooch Behar, India




Pdf Download