VEGETOS: An International Journal of Plant Research & Biotechnology
(Society For Plant Research)

Research Articles

A SOCIETY FOR PLANT RESEARCH PUBLICATION


Volume: 33, Issue: 4, December 2020


Print ISSN : 0970-4078.
Online ISSN : 2229-4473.
Website:www.vegetosindia.org
Pub Email: contact@vegetosindia.org
Views: 182

Doi: 10.1007/s42535-020-00163-0
Doi Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-020-00163-0
First Page: 722
Last Page: 743
Published: 24 October, 2020

Characterization and association mapping for drought adaptation in Ethiopian sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) germplasm


Abstract:

Knowledge of drought related traits and their mechanisms of drought adaptation are the key component in selecting genotypes that withstand the effects of drought in sorghum. The objectives of this study were to assess genetic variability among sorghum germplasm, to map QTL associated with root and shoot traits, and to identify tightly linked SSR markers. The experiment was carried out at Jimma University under greenhouse condition. One hundred thirty-six sorghum genotypes were characterized for twelve traits using a high throughput root phenotyping platform in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Among these genotypes, 108 of them were used for studying population structure and trait-marker association analysis using 39 SSR markers. The analysis of variance indicated that highly significant difference (P < 0.01) were observed among the genotypes for all the studied traits. The coefficients of correlation showed that there was a significant positive and negative association among different drought related traits. The first three principal components (PCs) with eigenvalues greater than one accounted for 56.4% of the total genotype variation, the remaining 43.60% accounted for the last nine principal components. All 136 genotype were grouped into four clusters whereby a different member within a cluster being assumed to be more closely related in terms of the trait under consideration with each other than that member in different clusters is. Moderate genotypic variation was exhibited for leaf area, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root to shoot ratio and root angle. Highest phenotypic variation was exhibited for leaf area, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight and root to shoot ratio. Broad sense heritability ranged from 19.35% for root length to 71.08% for shoot fresh weight and high heritability was recorded for shoot fresh weight (71.08%), leaf area (70.22%) and root angle (66.22%). High heritability combined with high genetic advance was observed for shoot fresh weight, root angle, and leaf area. The 108 genotypes were grouped into three distinct subgroups. The plots of LD (r2) showed a clear trend on linkage disequilibrium decay and based on trend line it is around 15–20 cM. A total of 25 significant marker-trait associations/QTLs (P ≤ 0.05) were detected with 14 SSR markers.

Vegetos

Keywords:


Association mapping, Drought, Imaging, Phenotyping, QTLs, Root angle, SSR


References:


  1. Alemu T (2009) Analysis of Genetic Diversity among Ethiopian Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] germplasm collections. An MSc. Thesis presented to the school of graduate studies of Hawasa University, p 98

  2. Ali MA, Abbas A, Niaz S, Zulkiffal M, Ali S (2009) Morpho-physiological criteria for drought tolerance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at seedling and post-anthesis stages. Int J Agric Biol 11(6):674–680

  3. Allard RW (1999) Principles of plant breeding, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 95–115

  4. Amsalu A, Endeshaw B, Bryngelsson T (2000) Genetic variation of Ethiopian and Eritrean sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) germplasm assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Genet Resour Crop Evolut 47:471

  5. Atnafu K (2010) Assessment of genetic diversity of Ethiopian sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) germplasm using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. An M.Sc. Thesis presented to the school of graduate studies of Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine (JUCAVM), p 92

  6. Besufekad Y, Bantte K (2013) Evaluation and association mapping for drought tolerance in Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) moench]. GJSFR-D Agric Vet 13(5):78

  7. Blum A (2004) Sorghum physiology. In: Nguyen HT, Blum A (eds) Physiology and biotechnology integration for plant breeding. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 141–223

  8. Borrell AK, Hammer GL, Douglas ACL (2000) Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought? I. Leaf growth and senescence. Crop Sci 40:11026–11103

  9. Borrell AK, van Oosterom EJ, Mullet JE, George-Jaeggli B, Jordan DR, Klein PE, Hammer GL (2014) Stay-green alleles individually enhance grain yield in sorghum under drought by modifying canopy development and water uptake patterns. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12869

  10. Burton GW, 1962. Quantitative Inheritance in grasses. In: Proceedings of the sixth international grassland congress, vol 1, pp 277–283

  11. Burton GW, DeVane EH (1953) Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festucaarundinacea) from replicated clonal material. Agron J 45:478–481

  12. Clayton WD, Renvoize SA (1986) Genera Graminum grasses of the world. Kew Bulletin Additional Series XIII, Royal Botanic, pp 338–345

  13. CSA (2015) Central Statistical Agency for Ethiopia, 2014–2015

  14. Deshmukh SN, Basu MS, Reddy PS (1986) Genetic variability, character association and path coefficients of quantitative traits in Virginia bunch varieties of groundnut. Indian J Agric Sci

  15. Earl DA (2012) Structure harvester: a website and program for visualizing structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4(2):359–361

  16. Ediage EN, Van Poucke C, De Saeger S (2015) A multi-analyte LC–MS/MS method for the analysis of 23 mycotoxins in different sorghum varieties: the forgotten sample matrix. Food Chem 177:397–404

  17. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software Structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620

  18. Hamada A, Nitta M, Nasuda S, Kato K, Fujita M, Matsunaka H, Okumoto Y (2012) Novel QTLs for growth angle of seminal roots in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Soil 354(1–2):395–405

  19. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE (1955) Estimation of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. J Agron 47:314–318

  20. Khaliq I, Irshad A, Ahsan M (2008) Awns and flag leaf contribution towards grain yield in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cer Res Commun 36:65–76

  21. Kim HK, Luquet D, van Oosterom E, Dingkuhn M, Hammer G (2010) Regulation of tillering in sorghum: genotypic effects. Ann Bot 106:69–78

  22. Lafarge TA, Hammer GL (2002) Tillering in grain sorghum over a wide range of population densities: modeling dynamics of tiller fertility. Ann Bot 90:99–110

  23. Lush JL (1949) Heritability of quantitative characters in farm animals. Hereditas 35(1):356–375

  24. Mace ES, Buhariwalla KK, Buhariwalla HK, Crouch JH (2003) A high-throughput DNA extraction protocol for tropical molecular breeding programs. Plant Mol Biol Rep 21(4):459–460

  25. Mace ES, Singh V, Van Oosterom EJ, Hammer GL, Hunt CH, Jordan DR (2012) QTL for nodal root angle in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) co-locate with QTL for traits associated with drought adaptation. Theor Appl Genet 124(1):97–109

  26. Malysheva-Otto L, Ganal M, Röder M (2006) Analysis of molecular diversity, population structure and linkage disequilibrium in a worldwide survey of cultivated barley germplasm (Hordeum vulgare L.). BMC Genet 7(6):1–14

  27. Mambani B, Lal R (1983) Response of upland rice varieties to drought stress. Plant Soil 73(1):73–94

  28. Mullet J, Morishige D, McCormick R, Truong S, Hilley J, McKinley B, Rooney W et al (2014) Energy Sorghum—a genetic model for the design of C4 grass bioenergy crops. J Exp Bot 65(13):3479–3489

  29. Muui CW, Muasya RM, Kirubi DT (2013) Baseline survey on factors affecting sorghum production and use in eastern Kenya. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev 13(1):7339–7353

  30. Nakamoto T, Oyanagi A (1994) The direction of growth of seminal roots of Triticum aestivum L. and experimental modification thereof. Ann Bot 73:363–367

  31. Nemera G, Labuschagne MT, Viljoen CD (2006) Genetic diversity analysis in sorghum germplasm as estimated by AFLP, SSR, and morpho-agronomical markers. Biodivers Conserv 15:3251–3265

  32. Panse VG (1957) Genetics of quantitative characters in relation to plant breeding. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 17:318–327

  33. Paterson AH (2014) Advancing the productivity frontier for Sorghum. In: Plant and animal genome XXII conference

  34. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, Gundlach H, Haberer G, Hellsten U, Mitros T, Poliakov A et al (2009) The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457:551–556

  35. Pennisi E (2008) Getting to the root of drought responses. Science 320(5873):173–173

  36. Perumal R, Krishnaramanujam R, Menz MA, Katilé S, Dahlberg J, Magill CW, Rooney WL (2007) Genetic diversity among sorghum races and working groups based on AFLPs and SSRs. Crop Sci 47(4):1375–1383

  37. Prichard JK, Stephens M, Rosenberg NA, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multi locus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

  38. Robbins M, Sim S, Yang W, Deynze A, van der Knaap E, Joobeur T, Francis D (2011) Mapping and linkage disequilibrium analysis with a genome-wide collection of SNPs that detect polymorphism in cultivated tomato. J Exp Bot 62(6):1831–1845

  39. Robinson HF, Comstock RE, Harvey PH (1949) Estimates of heritability and the degree of dominance in corn. Agron J 41(8):353–359

  40. Shi J, Wolf SE, Burke JM, Presting GG, Ross-Ibarra J, Dawe RK (2010) Widespread gene conversion in centromere cores. PLoS Biol 8(3):e1000327

  41. Singh V, van Oosterom EJ, Jordan DR, Messina CD, Cooper M, Hammer GL (2010) Morphological and architectural development of root systems in sorghum and maize. Plant Soil 333(1–2):287–299

  42. Singh V, van Oosterom EJ, Jordan DR, Hunt CH, Hammer GL (2011) Genetic variability and control of nodal root angle in sorghum. Crop Sci 51(5):2011–2020

  43. Sun DF, Ren WB, Sun G, Peng JH (2011) Molecular diversity and association mapping of quantitative traits in Tibetan wild and worldwide originated barley. Euphytica 178:31–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0260-6

  44. USDA (2016) World Sorghum production

  45. Wang ML, Sukumaran S, Barkley NA, Chen Z, Chen CY, Guo B, Pittman RN, Stalker HT, Holbrook CC, Pederson GA, Yu J (2011) Population structure and marker–trait association analysis of the US peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) mini-core collection. Theor Appl Genet 123(8):1307–1317

  46. Wilhite DA, Pulwarty RS (2005) Drought and water crises: lessons learned and the road ahead. In: Drought and water crises: science, technology, and management issues, pp 389–398

  47. Wortmann CS, Mamo M, Mburu C, Letayo E, Abebe G, Kayuki KC, Ndacyayisenga T et al (2009) Atlas of Sorghum production in Eastern and Southern Africa. The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

  48. Yan J, Shan T, Warburton M, Buckler E, McMullen M, Crouch J (2009) Genetic characterization and linkage disequilibrium estimation of a global maize collection using SNP markers. PLoS ONE 4(12):e8451

  49. Zhang D, Bai G, Zhu C, Yu J, Carver B (2010) Genetic diversity, population structure, and linkage disequilibrium in U.S. elite winter wheat. Plant Genome 3(2):117–127


  50.  


Acknowledgements :




Author Information:



Alemu Tebeje
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, University of Gondar, Biotechnology Institute, Gondar, Ethiopia
tebejealemu@gmail.com
Kassahun Bantte
Jimma University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma, Ethiopia


Temesgen Matiwos
Jimma University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma, Ethiopia

Andrew Borrell
The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation Hermitage Research Facility, Warwick, Australia




Pdf Download