Epistatic interactions for seed yield and component traits in Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata)

*Article not assigned to an issue yet

, ,


Research Articles | Published:

Print ISSN : 0970-4078.
Online ISSN : 2229-4473.
Website:www.vegetosindia.org
Pub Email: contact@vegetosindia.org
Doi: 10.1007/s42535-024-00987-0
First Page: 0
Last Page: 0
Views: 153


Keywords: Mustard, Triple test cross, Gene action, Additive, Dominance, Epistasis


Abstract


The present study was carried out to congregate information on nature of gene action for seed yield and other important characters in Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun). The materials for the investigation comprised of 16 fixed mutant lines, three testers i.e. Jayanti, P(4)2b and their F1 (Jayanti × P(4)2b) and resulting 48 TTC hybrids. These progenies and their parents were grown in randomized complete block design with three replications during rabi 2016–17 at the Experimental Farm of the Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK HPKV, Palampur (H.P.). Analysis of variance indicated the significance of mean squares due to genotypes for all the traits which revealed the presence of sufficient genetic variability in the existing material. Triple test cross analysis exhibited the presence of significant epistasis for all the traits except for plant height and harvest index. Further, partitioning of epistasis revealed the importance of ‘j + l’ (additive × dominance + dominance × dominance) type of epistasis for almost all the traits except for plant height and harvest index whereas, ‘i’ (additive × additive) type interactions were non-significant for all the traits except for days to 50 per cent flowering, number of secondary branches per plant, seeds per siliqua and oil content. The average degree of dominance (H/D)1/2 was in the range of partial dominance for most of the traits except for seeds per siliquae, biological yield per plant and oil content indicating the relative importance of fixable type of gene action in their inheritance.



*Get Access

(*Only SPR Life Members can get full access.)

Advertisement

References


Abdelsatar MA, Metwally YS, El-Demardash IS (2022) Triple test cross analysis for seed yield and its components in sesame under water stress conditions. Oil Crop Sci 7:71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocsci.2022.02.007


Doerksen T, Kannenberg L, Lee L (2003) Effect of recurrent selection on combining ability in maize breeding populations. Crop Sci 43:1652–1658


Dond KR, Beena N, Patil S, Puttawar M, Katre LA (2012) Genetic analysis of yield and yield contributing components in mustard (Brassica juncea). J Soils Crops 22:192–196


Jabeen A, Chadha S (2021) A triple test cross analysis to detect epistatic gene effects in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.): an updated methodology. Saudi J Biol Sci 28:6153–6157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.067


Jinks JL, Virk DS (1977) A modified triple test cross analysis to test and allow for inadequate testers. Heredity 39:165–170


Jinks JL, Perkins JM, Breese EL (1969) A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. II Appl Inbred Lines Hered 24:45–57


Kearsey ML, Jinks JL (1968) A general method for the detection of additive, dominance and epistatic components of variation for metrical traits. Heredity 23:403–409


Ketata H, Smith EL, Edwards LK, McNew RW (1976) Detection of epistatic, additive and dominance variation in winter wheat. Crop Sci 16:1–4


Kumari S, Kumar S, Kumar V, Chandel KS (2018) Triple test cross analysis for yield and its component traits in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). Plant Archives 18:669–675


Mall AK, Bhajan R (2015) Detection of epistasis, additive and dominance variation for some metric traits in Indian mustard under timely and late sown conditions. Progress Agric 15:99–103


Meena HS, Kumar A, Kulshrestha S, Ram B, Singh V, Meena PD, Singh D (2019) Detection of epistasis, additive and dominance components of variation for seed yield and its attributes in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian J Agric Sci 89:261–267


Nagaharu U (1935) Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn J Bot 7:389–452


Namayandeh A, Choukan R, Mohahhadi SA, Kamelmanesh MM, Ghasemi S, Hervan EM (2011) Genetic analysis of resistance to common smut in maize (Zea mays L.) using triple test cross. Afr J Agric Res 6:630–635


Raliya B, Kumar K, Ramesh P, Rakesh J, Meena HS, Mundiyara R (2018) Genetic studies for seed yield and component traits in mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Intern J Genet 10:412–414


Raman R, Qiu Y, Coombes N, Song J, Kilian A, Raman H (2017) Molecular diversity analysis and genetic mapping of pod shatter resistance loci in Brassica carinata L. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01765


Saleem MY, Iqbal Mirza J, Haq MA (2009) Triple test cross analysis of some physio-morphological traits in basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.). Pak J Bot 41:2411–2418


Singh P, Saharan RP, Singh D (2008) Detection of epistasis and estimation of additive and dominance components of genetic variation for different quantitative characters using triple test cross analysis in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss.]. Ann Agric Res 13:39–48


Singh N, Pant U, Dahiya N, Pandey S, Pandey AK, Chaturvedi S (2021) Unrevealing the role of epistasis through triple test cross in Indian mustard. Pantnagar J Res 19:330–334


Tripathi AK, Bhajan R, Kumar K (2005) Triple test cross analysis for metric traits in yellow sarson (Brassica rapa var. yellow sarson Prain) across environments. Ind J Genet Plant Breed 65:296–298


Upadhyay DK, Kumar K (2014) Genetics of agronomic characters in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss.] under normal and late sown conditions. Intern J Agric Sci 10(1):202–10


USDA. 2020. World Agricultural Production. United States Department of Agriculture. Foreign Agricultural Service.


Verma OP, Singh PV (1998) Triple test cross analysis in Indian mustard. Crucif Newsl 20:77–78




 


Acknowledgements


A special thanks to Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur (HP) for providing all the necessary facilities to conduct the investigation. The financial assistance provided by University Grant Commission (UGC) and Ministry of Tribal Affairs in the form of National Fellowship for Higher Education of ST Students (NFST) is also duly acknowledged.


Author Information


Kumar Vinod
CSK, Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, India
vinbarpa@gmail.com
Kumari Vedna
CSK, Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, India


Kesh Hari
College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Pasighat, India