Genetic inheritance pattern governing bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) resistant in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]: a crop improvement strategy

*Article not assigned to an issue yet

, ,


Research Articles | Published:

E-ISSN: 2229-4473.
Website: www.vegetosindia.org
Pub Email: contact@vegetosindia.org
DOI: 10.1007/s42535-026-01638-2
First Page: 0
Last Page: 0
Views: 108

Keywords: Mungbean, Bruchid, Resistance, Hybridization, Inheritance, Susceptibility index


Abstract


Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] is a vital pulse crop, serving as a significant source of plant-based protein and contributing to the livelihood of smallholder farmers. However, its storage is severely constrained by bruchid beetles (Callosobruchus maculatus), which infest seeds both in the field and during storage, causing substantial losses in seed quality, weight, and viability. This study aimed to develop bruchid-resistant mungbean genotypes through hybridization and to investigate the inheritance pattern of resistance. Resistant (PM-11-51) and susceptible (KM-139) parental genotypes were crossed, and F1 and F2 progenies were evaluated for bruchid infestation under controlled laboratory conditions. Parameters recorded included the number of eggs laid, adult emergence, seed damage, seed weight loss, mean development period, and the bruchid susceptibility index. F1 progenies exhibited complete resistance, suggesting dominant gene action. In the F2 generation, segregation analysis revealed 26 resistant and 10 susceptible progenies, conforming to the expected 3:1 ratio (χ² = 0.11, p > 0.05), confirming monogenic dominant inheritance. These results demonstrate that bruchid resistance can be effectively introgressed into susceptible genotypes, providing a practical approach for breeding programs aimed at enhancing post-harvest security and seed quality in mungbean.



References


Acquaah G (2007) Principles of plant genetics and breeding. Blackwell Publishing, Australia. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/5679061/principles-of-plant-genetics-and-breeding#google_vignette


Anderson E, Stebbins GL (1954) Hybridization as an evolutionary stimulus. Evolution 8:378–388. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1954.tb01504.x


Boling M, Sander DA, and Matlock (1961) Mungbean hybridization technique. Agron J 53:54–55. https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1961.00021962005300010020x


Clement SL, McPhee KE, Elberson LR, Evans MA (2009) Pea weevil, Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), resistance in Pisum sativum x Pisum fulvum interspecific crosses. Plant Breed 128:478–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2008.01603.x


Davies DR (1973) Differential activation of maternal and paternal loci in seed development. Nat New Biology 245:30–32. https://www.nature.com/articles/newbio245030a0


Dobie P (1974) The laboratory assessment of the inherent susceptibility of maize varieties to post-harvest infestation by Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Stored Prod Res 10:183–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-474X(74)90006-X


Egawa Y, Siriwardhane D, Tomooka N, Tomita K, Nakano H (1990) Collection of V. riukiuensis and reflex-pilosa, wild relatives of Azuki bean of Iriomote Island, Okinawa Prefecture. Plant Genetic Resour Explor 6:23–30.


Fratini R, Ruiz ML, Pe´rez de La, Vega M (2004) Intra-specific and inter-sub-specific crossing in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Can J Plant Sci 84:981–986. https://doi.org/10.4141/P03-201


Ghosh S, Roy A, Kundagrami S (2022) Screening of Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes against bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) attack to reduce postharvest losses. Legume Res 45:1019–1027. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4354


Gupta D, Sharma SK (2007) Widening the gene pool of cultivated lentils through introgression of alien chromatin from wild lens subspecies. Plant Breed 126:58–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01318.x


Kusolwa PM (2007) Breeding for bruchid resistance in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): Interspecific introgression of lectin-like seed proteins from tepary bean (P. acutifolius A. Gray), genetic control and bruchid characterization. Ph.D. Thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/downloads/nz806215g


Mather K (1951) The measurement of linkage in heredity. Methuen and Co. Ltd., London


Perera UIP, Chandika KKJ, Ratnasekera D (2017) Genetic variation, character association and evaluation of Mungbean genotypes for agronomic and yield components. J Natn Sci 45:347–353. https://doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v45i4.8228


Sharifi P, Astereki H, Pouresmael M (2018) Evaluation of variations in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) yield and yield components by multivariate technique. Ann Agrar Sci xxx:1–7


Singh BB, Dixit HK (2002) Possibilities and limitations of interspecific hybridization involving green gram (Phaseolus radiatus) and black gram (Phaseolus mungo). Indian J Agric Sci 72:676–678. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/41170


Singh BB, Singh DP (1998) Variation for yield components in the early segregating generations of a wide cross between Mungbean and Urdbean. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 58:113–115. https://www.isgpb.org/journal/index.php/IJGPB/article/view/2458


Singh VN, Pandey ND, Singh YP (1995) Relative resistance of gram varieties to Callosobruchus chinensis Linn. On the basis of biochemical parameters. Ind J Entomol 57:77–82


Singh MN, Singh RM, Singh UP (1996) Studies on hybrids and transgressive segregates in wide crosses of Mungbean and Urdbean. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 59:109–113. https://www.isgpb.org/journal/index.php/IJGPB/article/view/2629


Somta P, Ammaranan C, Ooi PAC, Srinives P (2007) Inheritance of seed resistance to bruchids in cultivated Mungbean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek). Euphytica 155:47–55. https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9299-9


Tomooka N, Kashiwaba K, Vaughan DA, Ishimoto M, Egawa Y (2000) The effectiveness of evaluating wild species: searching for sources of resistance to bruchid beetles in the genus vigna subgenus Ceratotropis. Euphytica 115:27–41. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1003906715119


Welsh JR (1981) Fundamentals of Plant Genetics and Breeding. John Wiley and Sons Canada


Young ND, Kumar L, Menancio-Hautea D, Danesh D, Talekar NS, Shanmugasundaram S (1992) RFLP mapping of a major bruchid resistance gene in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Theor Appl Genet 84:839–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227394


Zaid IU, Khalil IH, Khan S (2012) Genetic variability and correlation analysis for yield components in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). ARPN J Agric Biol Sci 7:885–991. http://www.arpnjournals.com/jabs/research_papers/rp_2012/jabs_1112_480.pdf


Kaga A, Ishii T, Tsukimoto K, Tokoro E, and Kamijima O (2000) Comparative molecular mapping in Ceratotropis species using an interspecific cross between Vigna umbellate and V. angularis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100: 207-213. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s001220050028

 


Author Information


Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Institute of Agricultural Science, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India