Genetic variability studies for yield and yield contributing traits in onion (Allium cepa L.)

Research Articles | Published:

Print ISSN : 0970-4078.
Online ISSN : 2229-4473.
Website:www.vegetosindia.org
Pub Email: contact@vegetosindia.org
Doi: 10.1007/s42535-020-00170-1
First Page: 174
Last Page: 182
Views: 612


Keywords: Allium cepa L., Correlation, GAM, GCV, Heritability, Path analysis, PCV


Abstract

The onion (Allium cepa L.) bulb productivity is influenced by genotypes and seasonal environmental conditions. The selection of diverse genotypes with high variability is highly desirable, along with the extent of heritability and genetic advance of genotypes for wide adoption and cultivation. The present investigation was carried out by collecting genotypes from the onion growers. The results revealed that the variance of onion genotypes characters ranged from 2.87 to 43.56% for the genotypic coefficient of variation, 3.65 to 46.24% for the phenotypic coefficient of variation. Traits with higher genotypic coefficients of variation and phenotypic coefficients of variation indicated the existence of variation of traits among genotypes and lines. Heritability ranged from 24.72 to 96.85% and genetic advance mean ranged from 2.94 to 84.55%. Higher heritability and genetic advance mean to indicate the presence of additive gene action, thereby indicating that simple mass selection would be more reliable to improve traits in onion. The degree of association, the genotypic correlation was greater than the phenotypic correlation among onion genotypes. The yield was highly significant and was, correlated with growth and yield attributing traits among genotypes. Plot yield was influenced by direct and indirect positive, and negative, effects of growth, quality and yield attributing traits. Direct mass selection of desirable traits would be effective for bulb yield improvement in onion.



*Pdf Download

(*Only SPR Members can download pdf file; #Open Access;)

References

  1. Allard RW (1960) Principles of plant breeding. Wiley, New York, pp 85–95

  2. Ananthan M, Balakrishnamoorthy G (2007) Genetic variability and correlation studies in onion (Allium cepa var. cepa L.) for economic dry matter yield. Agric Sci Digest 27(3):190–193

  3. Anthon GE, Barrett DM (2003) Modified method for the determination of pyruvic acid with di–nitro phenyl hydrazine (DNPH) in the assessment of onion pungency. J Sci Food Agric 83(12):1210–1213

  4. Balareddy CB (1999) Studies on growth, yield and post harvest qualities of onion (Allium cepa L.) as influenced by varieties and growth regulators. Dissertation: University Agricultural Science, Dharwad

  5. Bhangale GT, Joi MB (1985) Screening of onion cultivar for resistance to purple blotch and thrips. J Maharashtra Agric Univ 10:355–356

  6. Burton CW, Devane EH (1953) Estimating heritability in tall Fescue (Festuca arundinaceae) from replicated clonal material. Agron J 45:478–481

  7. Degewione A, Alamerew S, Tabor G (2011) Genetic variability and association of bulb yield and related traits in shallot (Allium cepa var. Aggregatum DON.) in Ethiopia. Inter J Agric Res 6(7):517–536

  8. Demisie R, Tolessa K (2017) Growth and bulb yield of onion (Allium cepa L.) in response to plant density and variety in Jimma, south western Ethiopia. Adv Crop Sci Tech 6(2):357. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8863.1000357

  9. Dewey DR, Lu KH (1959) A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agron J 51:515–519

  10. Dhiman JS, Chandha ML, Sidhu AS (1986) Studies on relative reaction of onion genotypes against purple blotch disease. Veg Sci 13:304–310

  11. Dhotre M, Alloli TB, Athani SI, Halemani LC (2010) Genetic variability, character association and path analysis studies in Kharif onion (Allium cepa var. cepa L.). Asian J Hortic 5(1):143–146

  12. Gurjar RSS, Singhania DL (2006) Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis of yield and yield components in onion. Indian J Hort 63(1):53–58

  13. Havey MJ (1993) Onion breeding. In: Kalloo G, Berg B (eds) Genetic improvement of vegetable crops. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 35–49

  14. Haydar A, Sharker N, Ahmed MB, Hannan MM, Razvy MA, Hossain M, Hoque A, Karim R (2007) Genetic variability and interrelationship in onion (Allium cepa L.). Middle East J Sci Res 2(3–4):132–134

  15. Hosamani RM, Patil BC, Ajjappalavara PS (2010) Genetic variability and character association studies in onion (Allium cepa L.). Karnataka J Agric Sci 23(2):302–305

  16. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE (1955) Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron J 47:314–318

  17. Mahanthesh B, Ravi PS, Harshavardhan M, Vishnuvardhana Janardhan G (2009) Evaluation of different onion (Allium cepa L.) genotypes for yield and processing quality parameters in kharif season under irrigated condition. Asian J Hort 3(1):5–9

  18. Mohanty BK, Prusti AM (2001) Studies on variability, heritability, correlation and path coefficient in kharif onion. Orrisa J Hort 29(2):75–78

  19. Netrapal SN, Chaudhary B (1988) Correlation and path coefficient studies in onion. Indian J Hort 45(3–4):295–299

  20. Panse VG, Sukhatme DV (1967) Statistical methods for agricultural workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research Publication, New Delhi, p 115

  21. Patil AH, Dod VN, Kale PB, Kulwal LV (1993) Performance of onion varieties with reference to seed production. PKV Res J 14(2):123–126

  22. Raghuwanshi OS, Jain PK, Sengupta SK, Dangi AS, Verma NR, Sunil P (2016) Correlation and path analysis study in diverse onion (Allium cepa L.) genotypes. Asian J Hort 11:19–24

  23. Ram RB, Bharti N, Meena ML, Lata R, Babu M (2011) Genetic variability and correlation studies in onion (Allium cepa L.). Vegetos 24(1):152–156

  24. Robinson HF, Comstock RE, Harvey VH (1949) Estimates of heritability and degree of dominance in corn. Agron J 41:353–359

  25. Sadasivam S, Manickam A (1992) Biochemical methods for agricultural sciences. Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi

  26. Sheoran OP, Tonk DS, Kaushik LS, Hasija RC, Pannu RS (1998) Statistical software package for agricultural research workers: recent advances in information theory. In: Hooda DS, Hasija RC (eds) Statistics and computer applications. Department of Mathematics Statistics, CCS HAU, Hisar, pp 139–143. http://14.139.232.166/opstat/

  27. Shivasubramanian S, Menon N (1973) Heterosis and inbreeding depression in rice. Madras Agric J 60:1139–1144

  28. UHS (2013) University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot, Karnataka, Package of practice: onion, pp 111–114. http://uhsbagalkot.edu.in/downloads/Horticulture_POP.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2017

  29. Wricke G, Weber WE (1986) Quantitative Genetics and Selection in Plant Breeding. Walter de Gruyter and Co., Berlin

  30. Wright TS (1921) Correlation and causation. J Agric Res 20:557–587


    31.  


Acknowledgements

We convey our thanks to Dr. Jai Gopal, Former Director, Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Rajgurunagar, Pune, and Dean, College of Horticulture, Bengaluru belong to the University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot, India for facilitating research work.


Author Information

Manjunathagowda Dalasanuru Chandregowda
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India
dcmgowda@gmail.com