Comparative Quantitative Gene Expression analysis Between Salinity Tolerant and Susceptible Varieties of Chickpea

Mittal Neha1,2, Saxena R S


Research Articles | Published:

Print ISSN : 0970-4078.
Online ISSN : 2229-4473.
Website:www.vegetosindia.org
Pub Email: contact@vegetosindia.org
Doi: 10.5958/2229-4473.2015.00044.0
First Page: 103
Last Page: 110
Views: 1239


Keywords: abiotic stress, chickpea, marker assist-ed selection.


Abstract


Salinity is one of the greatest limiting factors in agriculture. Therefore, the ability of plants to adapt saline conditions is crucial to sus-tain worldwide crop production. Present study is meant to identify gene specific markers for salt tolerance in Chickpea. Selected chickpea geno-types were already characterized for salt tolerance and susceptibility. Sixteen gene specif-ic primers were designed from already identified abiotic stress resistant genes from database among which five were used for semi-quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The expression levels of two of them allow discrimination between toler-ant and susceptible genotypes. In tolerant genotypes (JG-62 and Pusa 1053) the expression level of these genes was higher as compared to susceptible genotypes (BG-256 and ICCV2). For primer 13 the relative fold increase in gene expression was 10 times as compared to 2 times in susceptible plants. For primer 6 the relative fold increase in gene expression was 5 folds in Pusa 1053 (tolerant) as compared to 4 folds in other geno-types. Gene expression was observed to be maxi-mum at 200mM concentration in almost all gen-otypes for above two gene specific primers. So, primer 13 is a potent gene for gene pyramiding in susceptible varieties for salt stress.


*Get Access

(*Only SPR Members can get full access. Click Here to Apply and get access)

Advertisement

References



Acknowledgements



Author Information


Mittal Neha12 Saxena R S
1Department of Biotechnology, S.V.P. University of Agriculture & Technology, Meerut-250110, (UP), India

2Department of Botany, Meerut College, C.C.S. University, Uttar Pradesh, India

3Department of Botany, Ch. Charan Singh (PG) College, Heonra (Saifai), Etawah, (UP), India

4Directorate of Science & Innovation, Ami-ty University, Noida

5Division of Genetics, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012

6Di-vision of Genetics & Molecular Biology, National